Scientific article of any leading database, journal and author must have a clear full-fledged structure, which is most often the main framework for high-quality and understandable scientific work, and this is: the title, abstract, keywords, introduction, literature review, methodology and results, discussion (discussion), conclusions and reference list of references, which was involved in finding information.
The "discussion" section plays an important role in any publication of scientific articles. The "discussion" part allows the author of the text to fully disclose the information submitted and to explain the main point of the paper in a more free and accessible form.
Of course this will be real, but such a structure of written work will entail certain limitations in the dissemination and accessibility of the text. So, in order to publish an article in Scopus or Web of Science, your project is duly obliged to adhere to the generally accepted consistent norm of written sections, where one way or another will be allocated space for discussion of the chosen topic for articles. Through proper organization of the text, your time will not be wasted.
- concluding from the results of the study what the author agrees with and what he has doubts about;
- a full explanation of one's personal position with a clear example and one's own evidence for one or another theory;
- holistic description of their views and positions, methods and techniques, if this scientific article includes the author's disagreement with certain results of the experiment;
- give a list of difficulties and factors that may have hindered the intended course of the study, or the general scientific discipline;
- indicate further prospects for the development of the resulting experience, based on scientific topics and practice; analysis of the possible methodology and results of the study with real similar cases.
making a list of the leading results of the study, without departing from whether the chosen hypothesis is confirmed or questioned, as well as the correlation of these results with the realities of other researchers;
- grouping the results of the experiment;
- analyzing and drawing parallels between one's own and others' data;
- providing all sorts of interpretations of what is common and different in comparison with the results of other projects;
- reference to the first sections of a scientific paper: the purpose and hypothesis;
- finding an analogy between the findings and the hypothesis posed;
- provide the real benefits of the research conducted and the ways in which its results can be applied in practice.
- restatement or a plain copy of the results of the study;
- the outcome in the form of unsubstantiated conclusions;
- a synonymous retelling of earlier scholarly works;
- reassessment of the results and their significance;
- criticism of other researchers.
Also, the successful publication of scientific articles lies in maintaining its clear working structure, which will avoid unimportant and insignificant topics, issues and references.
Conclusion: The "discussion" section is the main part of the communication between the author and the reader. Discussion makes it possible to understand and fully derive the desired information from the research conducted, and the scientific publication itself becomes even more qualitative.